So true, but it seems to me - from reading the review - that Warner's (shall we say?) “banal bashing” also has very little to do with it!
I suggest that Warner's “demystifying banality” is just the other side of the same coin that is expected to be dropped into the donation boxes at the market stalls in that illusive and deluded world of spiritual mercantilism.
Come to think of it:
- What if Warner, Osho, Allan Watts and the like all have something in common: that they are (were) somehow unable (disabled perhaps?) to have their genuine (yes!) enlightened insights help them to actually and factually realize & apply them - that is making them tangibly real!
- What if they were somehow prevented from realizing their authentic and genuine existential/essential liberation (freedom, moksha)?
It seems to me that what they have in common is that they are (were) not able (yet?) to detach themselves from the compulsiveness of their compulsions while they unfortunately assumed that their giving up and giving in, their letting go and letting it all hang is the real thing... not suspecting it to be as deluded as (indeed) the “mystical serenity” of their more hallowed new age competitors, the spiritual mystical strivers, the ones they so seem to detest...